Stefan Pohl Computer ChessHome of famous UHO openings and EAS RatinglistLatest Website-News (2026/08/21): Testrun of Cinder 0.6 finished: +62 Celo to Cinder 0.5.1 - very impressive progress. Cinder made it back into the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist and kicked Berserk 14 out. Cinder 0.6 shows some very strange Decision Time stats: The mean- and the P90-value are extremly high - much higher than all other engines in the Top15. The P90 value is around 2.5x times higher than the P90s of all other Top15 engines... This is already the 2nd time, the new Decison Time stats show a very strange behaviour of a top-engine (Viridithas 20 is the other one). If anybody still thinks, this new completely new feature, introduced by me, is useless - then perhaps you should look out for a new hobby instead of computerchess.
A completely new feature was added to my UHO-Top15 Ratinglist: Decision Time statistics Meanwhile my UHO-Top15 Ratinglist gamesbase contains only games with the Decision Time stored, except only one head-to-head (Obsidian vs Integral). So, from now, you can see the Decision Time statistics. Thomas Zipproth (Kudos to Thomas!!!) wrote an excellent tool, doing this (download it here). It needs, of course, enginegames played with the new cutechess (-cli or GUI), download here Right above the main ratinglist, I added a new link: "See the Decision Time statistics of the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist" or click directly here
Ceres Binary here, Ceres Installation Guide here, Ceres Nets here
Dont forget to take a look at my EAS-Ratinglist (The world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines, but engines's style of play).
Next testrun: Stockfish 260819
My 2 cents about AI generated engines: AI doing the coding is the future of programming - no doubt about that, IMHO. Additionally, as a tester, I have the problem, that (in the future) it will be impossible to figure out, if an engine was AI-coded or done by humans, if the "author" wants to hide the truth... and what about a mix of AI-code and human-code in one engine? Where is the borderline? So, I decided to test AI-generated engines, too. As long as I know, that an engine was done by AI, I will add "AI" to the engine-name to my Ratinglist. We will see, what the future brings. If AI generated engines flood the ratinglists, a thinkover could be necessary, of course.
Stay tuned. UHO-Top15 Engines Ratinglist (+ regular testing of Stockfish Dev-versions)
Playing conditions:
The 15 strongest engines and the latest StockfishDev version are playing 1000 games vs. each opponent: 15000 games per engine are played. A RoundRobin Tournament with 120000 games overall !
Hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX 16-core (32 threads) notebook with 64GB RAM (since 2024/10/08), 2 identical machines. Windows 11 64bit Speed: (singlethread, TurboBoost-mode switched off, chess starting position) Stockfish 17: 600 kn/s (when 26 games are running simultaneously) Hash: 512MB per engine GUI: Cutechess-cli (GUI ends game, when a 5-piece endgame is on the board, all other games are played until mate or draw by chess-rules (3fold, 50-moves, stalemate)) Tablebases: None for engines, 5 Syzygy for cutechess-cli Openings: My UHO_2022_6mvs_+120_+129 openings are used (first 500 lines) (UHO 2022 openings are part of my Anti Draw Openings download-package). Ponder, Large Memory Pages & learning: Off Thinking time: 3min+1sec per game/engine. One testrun (15000 games) takes around 80-85 hours (=3.5 days) The version-numbers of the Stockfish engines are the date of the latest patch, which was included in the Stockfish sourcecode, not the release-date of the engine-file, written backwards (year,month,day))(example: 200807 = August, 7, 2020). The used SF compile is the AVX512-compile, which is the fastest on my AMD Ryzen CPU. SF binaries are taken from https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/releases (except the official SF-release versions, which are taken form the official Stockfish website). Read the explanation, why I chose my testing-conditions, like I did here
Latest update: 2026/08/21: Cinder 0.6 (+62 Celo to Cinder 0.5.1)
(Ordo-calculation fixed to Stockfish 18 = 3873 Celo. Mention, there are no human or "realistic" Elo numbers in enginechess, since the engines reached superhuman strength, so I decided to use "Celo" (=Computer Elo) instead)
See the tournament cross-table as a picture (done by Fritz20 GUI) here See the individual statistics of engine-results here See the Engines Aggressiveness Score Ratinglist here See the Gamepair-statistics of the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist here See the Decision Time statistics of the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist here See the full UHO Ratinglist (with EAS-Ratinglist): here Download the current gamebase, the full-list gamebase and the archive here See the old SPCC-Ratinglist (full list) and EAS-List from 2020 until 2023/08/28: here
(best Stockfish Celo: Stockfish 260803: 3907 Celo, latest full release (Stockfish 18) has 3873 Celo) Program Celo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws 1 Stockfish 260803 : 3906 4 4 15000 68.4% 3770 48.6%
Games : 120000 (finished) Below the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist, recalculated with Gamepairs (using my Gamepair Rescoring Tool V1.5), Ordo-calculation fixed to Stockfish 17.1 = 3854 Celo, realizing Vondele's (Stockfish Maintainer) idea: "Thinking uniquely in game pairs makes sense with the biased openings used these days. While pentanomial makes sense it is a bit complicated so we could simplify and score game pairs only (not games) as W-L-D (a traditional score of 2-0, or 1.5-0.5 is just a W)." Mention, the errorbar here is +/-5.5 Celo (=11 overall Error), compared to +/-4 Celo in the classical ratinglist above (=1.375 wider errorbar here). But the result-gaps are (at least) 2x up to 2.5x bigger (in average), calculating with gamepairs. So, the statistical reliability of the results is much better in the Gamepair-ratinglist, compared to the classical ratinglist... CFS means Chance For Superiority in percent, calculated by ORDO. See the head-to-head gamepair-statistics of the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist here # PLAYER : Celo Error Pairs W D L (%) CFS(%)
------------------------------------------------------------------- Aborted testruns, because the tested engine was too weak to enter the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist: Icarus 1.1, Heimdall 1.5, Renegade 1.2.0, Igel 3.6.0, Minic 3.41, Booot 7.3, Black Marlin 9.0, Equisetum 1.0, Clarity 8, PZChessBot 7.1, Prune 4.0.1 Below you find a diagram of the progress of Stockfish in my tests since February 2026. And below that diagram, the older diagrams.
You can save the diagrams on your PC with mouseclick (right button) and then choose "save image"...        
Sie sind Besucher Nr. |
